|
|
|
|
Cricket
legend Tiger Pataudi was supposedly a nawab of a different class.
But after the Jhajjhar incident, where he allegedly hunted the protected
Black Buck,
it seems he wasn’t so different a nawab |
By
Nishtha Shukla |
|
|
|
Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi is used to applause. In his teens when
he shot a tiger the aristocracy applauded, and nicknamed him Tiger.
When at 21, he became the world’s youngest national captain,
he was the toast of the cricketing world. When he led India to
its first ever Test win, he was the poster of Indian sports. But
on June 3, when he shot an endangered Black Buck—Antilope
Cervicapra—and two rabbits, nobody was clapping. On June
5, a first information report was registered against him and seven
other accused after the police recovered the carcasses of the
black buck and two rabbits from the vehicle in which they were
travelling. After the Haryana Police seized the carcasses from
his car and let Pataudi go, the jeers could be heard loud and
clear. The newspapers, the public, and the environmentalists wanted
his head.
Tiger was a hunted man. He was asked to appear before court,
but he would rather remain in the shadows. Pataudi’s petition
to the court he said the June 5 complaint was a “highly
belated one”. The vehicle used by the hunters, registered
in the 65-year-old Pataudi’s name, had been impounded from
his bungalow in Vasant Vihar in south Delhi.
With Pataudi dodging the police as well as the media for almost
two weeks, the case took a different turn. On June 18 he surfaced
and surrendered before the court after the high court rejected
his request for anticipatory bail. The Haryana Police were given
custody of the nawab along with the seven associates later. In
his two days of custody, the nawab was kept in good condition.
The accused were booked under the sections 9, 39 and 51 of the
Wildlife Protection Act and if found guilty, could face a jail
term of up to seven years and a fine of Rs 25,000. After two days
in custody, Pataudi complained of uneasiness and chest pain and
was taken to the civil hospital. Following which the nawab was
granted bail by Chief Judicial Magistrate Sudhir Jiwan on the
condition of furnishing a bond for Rs 50,000 and a surety of a
similar amount. The co-accused in the case are also out on bail
now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED
CLAN : While Tiger was on the run, wife Sharmila and the children
stayed solidly behind him |
|
|
|
|
The
incident sparked interest across society. Wildlife activists said
the guilty should be booked, however rich or powerful they may be.
Naresh Kadyan, a leading animal-rights activist, said that he would
approach the court seeking cancellation of the bail. His said he
would like to first seek legal advice on how Pataudi’s bail
in the high court was rejected and a lower court granted it.
For the Bishnois of the Jhajjar area, “killing a black buck
is like killing our Guru”. They threatened to launch an agitation
if Pataudi was not arrested. Akhil Bharatiya Bishnoi Jeev Raksha
Samiti general secretary, Sahab Ram Bishnoi, said they would soon
be meeting Haryana Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda and urge
him to ensure the guilty don’t go scot-free.
The man’s family stood by him. Wife Sharmila Tagore, who is
also the chairperson of the censor board, said, “I always
had faith in the judiciary but, more importantly, I believed in
God. He saw us through this.” The family has, however, decided
to remain quiet about the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger
Pataudi was earlier been in the news for shooting birds in the protected
forests of Hokarsar in Jammu & Kashmir. In 1998, his son Saif
Ali Khan was also involved in a case where Salman Khan was accused
of shooting a Black Buck near Jodhpur. Saif celebrated Father’s
Day without Pataudi this time, “This incident has brought
me closer to my dad. I was scared of him earlier. Now when he’s
landed in trouble I feel protective.”The case has also dampened
the success of his recent release Parineeta. Younger sister Soha,
who recently entered Bollywood, was in Italy shooting for David
Dhawan’s film Shaadi No.1.
According to reports, wildlife officials have not been informed
and the Haryana Police have let off all accused after just filing
a report in the Jhajjar police station. Even their weapons and vehicles
were not confiscated. The apparent laxity on the part of the Jhajjar
Police even finds mention in Pataudi’s petition to the court.
The shikaar tradition of the Raj days seems to have stayed with
the nawabs even as their titles have not. The police were tipped
off during the Raj to ignore expeditions by the rich, famous or
powerful. Let’s hope the same doesn’t continue with
the law and well-meaning activists in place today.
|
|
|
|
|
|